Evaluating the utility of routine urine culture and antibiotic treatment in children with neurogenic bladder undergoing intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA injection.

INTRODUCTION: OnabotulinumtoxinA is used as treatment for refractory idiopathic and neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children. Many patients perform intermittent self-catheterization and therefore have higher rates of asymptomatic bacteriuria, which may increase their risk of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) following treatment. Multiple injections are often needed due to the short-term efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, which may also increase the risk of UTI. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate whether a sterile urinary tract is necessary to decrease the risk of postoperative UTI in pediatric patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection from 2014 to 2021 was performed. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, antibiotic treatment and culture results were collected. A positive urine culture was defined as ≥ 103 CFU/ml of uropathogenic bacteria. Our primary outcome was symptomatic UTI within 14 days of the procedure. RESULTS: 103 patients underwent 158 treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA. The incidence of postoperative UTI was 3.2%. The incidence of symptomatic postoperative UTI in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria compared to those with sterile urine was not significantly different (3.8% vs 0%, p = 0.57). Obtaining a preoperative urinalysis or urine culture did not affect the incidence of postoperative UTI (p = 0.54). The number needed to treat with antibiotics to prevent one postoperative UTI was 27. The incidence of postoperative UTI was highest in patients with low-risk bladders (p = 0.043). Prior history of multi-drug resistant UTI was a risk factor for postoperative UTI (p = 0.048). DISCUSSION: For children undergoing onabotulinumtoxinA injection, there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and the need to screen for and treat asymptomatic bacteruria prior to treatment. Our study addresses this important clinical question, and shows no difference in the rate of postoperative UTI between patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria and those with sterile urine. Patients with a history of multi-drug resistant UTI are at increased risk of symptomatic postoperative UTI and may benefit from preoperative urine testing and treatment. Limitations of our retrospective study include its small sample size in the face of such a low incidence of our primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of UTI following onabotulinumtoxinA injection in children is low. The presence of sterile urine at the time of surgery does not significantly decrease the risk of postoperative UTI. Routine treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to surgery results in a large number of patients receiving unnecessary antibiotics. As a result, we recommend against preoperative urine testing for most asymptomatic patients.

Testicular Core Extraction: Important Technique for Determining Sperm Retrieval Method in Non-obstructive Azoospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of preliminary testicular core extraction (TCE) as a tool for determining whether to pursue clinic testicular extraction (cTESE) versus microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to minimize both financial burden and procedural complexity. METHODS: All men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) from 2018 to 2022 who underwent clinic TCE were analyzed. Patients who were found to have sperm on initial TCE were recommended cTESE. Patients who did not have sperm on initial TCE were recommended for mTESE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TCE were calculated. Cost reductions were determined based on this institution's fees. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to determine statistical significance between the results of the TCE sperm present and sperm absent groups. RESULTS: Of the 82 NOA patients undergoing TCE, 51 (62.2%) core biopsies were positive for sperm and 31 (37.8%) were negative for sperm. The SRR for 35 men who then underwent cTESE following sperm seen on TCE was 97.1%. The SRR for 8 men who underwent mTESE after no sperm was found on TCE was 75%. The positive predictive value of TCE for successful TESE result is 94.4% for men with NOA. Treatment success rate of TCE and cTESE was 79.1% with a cost reduction of 59.4%. CONCLUSION: TCE is a prognostic tool to guide decision making between cTESE and mTESE and maximize sperm retrieval rate while mitigating financial burden and operative complexity. TCE is important to identify ideal candidates for both procedures to maximize efficacy and safety amongst men with NOA.